Single member hearing stayed matter for 6 weeks to allow respondent to file replies after service of applications was disputed while pending division bench appeal.
Six weeks time granted to Respondent to file replies with advance copies to other sides.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPTA AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-7715/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-340/HYD/2012 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Jeshta Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-7716/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-341/HYD/2012 |
||
| Satabisha Agro Pvt. Ltd. | ... | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| 3. MP-PMLA-7717/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-342/HYD/2012 |
||
| Savana Agro Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| 4. MP-PMLA-7707/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-343/HYD/2012 |
||
| Rohini Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| 5. MP-PMLA-7708/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-344/HYD/2012 |
||
| Chitta Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-340 to 349/HYD/2012, FPA-PMLA-303, 307& 87/HYD/2011, FPA-PMLA-109/HYD/2010,
Page 1 of 4
| **6. ** | MP-PMLA-7718/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-345/HYD/2012 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Punarvasu Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| **7. ** | MP-PMLA-7719/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-346/HYD/2012 |
||
| Hastha Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| **8. ** | MP-PMLA-7720/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-347/HYD/2012 |
||
| Hasagiri Greenlands Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| **9. ** | MP-PMLA-7709/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-348/HYD/2012 |
||
| Vishnupadi Greenlands Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| 10. | MP-PMLA-7721/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-349/HYD/2012 |
||
| Arunagiri Agrofarms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| 11. | MP-PMLA-7741/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-303/HYD/2011 |
||
| Arda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director | |||
Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-340 to 349/HYD/2012, FPA-PMLA-303, 307& 87/HYD/2011, FPA-PMLA-109/HYD/2010,
Page 2 of 4
| 12. | MP-PMLA-7740/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-307/HYD/2011 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitravinda Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| 13. | MP-PMLA-7738/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-109/HYD/2010 |
||
| Kali Greenfields P Ltd. | ... | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent | |
| 14. | MP-PMLA-7739/HYD/2020 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-87/HYD/2011 |
||
| THAVA AGRO FARMS (P) LTD. | … | Appellant/Applicant | |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director | |||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Mr. Shridhar Potaraju, Adv. Mr. Rama Krishnan Raju, Adv. Mr. Yashir Khan, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER | |
| 16.10.2020 |
The matters are taken up through Video Conferencing. The
appearances of ld. Counsels for both the parties are as above.
MP-PMLA-7715/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7716/HYD/2020 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-7717/HYD/2020 (Misc.),MP-PMLA-7707/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7708/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7709/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7718/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7719/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7720/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7721/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7740/HYD/2020 (Misc.), MP-PMLA-7738/HYD/2020 (Misc.) & MP-PMLA-7739/HYD/2020 (Misc.)
FPA-PMLA-340 to 349/HYD/2012, FPA-PMLA-303, 307& 87/HYD/2011, FPA-PMLA-109/HYD/2010,
Page 3 of 4
The present applications have been filed by appellants/applicants for seeking directions to release the attached properties to the applicants/appellants, on the grounds stated therein, till the disposal of the appeals.
Heard both sides. Issue notice. Mr. Vikas Garg, ld. Counsel for the respondent accepts notice and submitted that he has enquired from the Enforcement Directorate that the copy of the applications and annexures have not been served. On the other hand, the ld. Counsel for the appellants submitted that the copy of the applications with annexures have been served in the office of the Enforcement Directorate, New Delhi. However, the ld. Counsel for the applicants has agreed to supply the soft copy of the applications with annexures through e-mail during the course of the day. The ld. Counsel for the respondent seeks six weeks time to file the replies to the applications, which is not objected. Let the same be filed within six weeks with advance copies to the other sides.
During the course of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the respondent drew the attention of this Tribunal to the order dated 15.10.2019 and submitted that the appellants have filed applications for hearing of the appeals by Division Bench of the Tribunal and pending the said applications, the applicants cannot ask this bench presided by single member to hear the present applications.
The respondent may raised this issue at relevant point of time.
With the consent of both the parties, list the applications on 13th January, 2021, when the appeals are listed.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 16th October, 2020 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-340 to 349/HYD/2012, FPA-PMLA-303, 307& 87/HYD/2011, FPA-PMLA-109/HYD/2010,
Page 4 of 4
Jeshta Farms Pvt. Ltd.
Satabisha Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Savana Agro Pvt. Ltd.
Rohini Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd.
Chitta Farms Pvt. Ltd.
Punarvasu Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd.
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
