The Acting Chairman adjourned the matter pending the filing of a reply by the respondent and granted an extension subject to strict timelines for subsequent filings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-6218/CHD/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-3130/CHD/2019
Corporation Bank
… Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Alok Kumar & Ms. Somya Yadav, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 08.01.2020
FPA-PMLA-3130/CHD/2019
Counsels for both sides are present. Reply is yet to be filed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent is seeking some more time to file the same. Counsel for the appellant is raising objection to grant of any further adjournment to file the reply. However, the same is considered. In the interest of justice, as a last chance, the respondent is allowed to file the reply with an advance copy to be served on other side who may file rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 13th July, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 8th January, 2020
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-3130/CHD/2019
Page 1 of 1
Corporation Bank
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
