The Tribunal recorded the presence of learned counsels for both parties and allowed the respondent to file a reply to the appeal with a direction to serve it within the specified timeframe, noting no opposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5301/MUM/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-5302/MUM/2018 (COD) MP-PMLA-5303/MUM/2018 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-2726/MUM/2018
BMM Construction and Projects Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai& Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Prateek Chadha, Advocate Mr. Yash Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 (ED) : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.01.2020
FPA-PMLA-2726/MUM/2018
Learned counsels for both the parties are present. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that he is filing the reply in the Registry during the course of the day. The same is not opposed by the learned counsel for the appellant. The respondent is allowed to file reply to the appeal and directed that a copy of the same be served on the other side, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks from the date of the receipt of the reply.
List on 28th July, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 14th January, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2726/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 1
BMM Construction and Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
