This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-4865/DLI/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-2499/DLI/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Shri Karti P. Chidambaram | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director |
||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-4857/DLI/2018 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-2500/DLI/2018 |
||
| V. Murali | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-4866/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4867/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2505/DLI/2018 |
||
| M/s. Chess Global Advisory Services | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-4868/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4869/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2506/DLI/2018 |
||
| M/s. Chess Global Advisory Services | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-4870/DLI/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4871/DLI/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2507/DLI/2018 |
||
| Shri R. Balachandran | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Sh. Shreedhar Kale, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Ms. Sonia Mathur, Sr. Counsel Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Amit Mahajan, ASG |
FPA-PMLA-2499-2500, 2505-2507/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 2
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA
: ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 08.01.2020
FPA-PMLA-2499-2500, 2505-2507/DLI/2018
The learned counsels for both the parties are present. Pleadings are complete. The learned counsel for the appellant has stated that he has already filed the written synopsis on 8th July, 2019. The same is not available on record. The registry is to trace and placed the written synopsis on record. The registry is directed to trace the same and placed it on record. The learned counsel for the Respondent is seeking time to file the written synopsis. The same is allowed.
List on 22nd July, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 08th January, 2020.
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-2499-2500, 2505-2507/DLI/2018
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow time for filing a written synopsis by the respondent.
Whether to direct the registry to trace the appellant's missing written synopsis.
Whether to list the pending matters for future hearing.
Karti P. Chidambaram
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
V. Murali
R. Balachandran
M/s. Chess Global Advisory Services
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
