A single-line order adjourned five filed matters in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act jurisdiction. The tribunal suspended hearing due to a notice regarding work suspension and clarified that any interim stay orders continue until the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA 2386/IDR/2018
Shri Satish Saraogi … Appellant/Applicant 2. FPA-PMLA 2387/IDR/2018 Smt. Hemalata Saraogi … Appellant/Applicant 3. FPA-PMLA 2388/IDR/2018 Manish Saraogi … Appellant/Applicant 4. FPA-PMLA 2389/IDR/2018 Smt. Reeta Mistry … Appellant/Applicant 5. FPA-PMLA 2390/IDR/2018 Shri Manvendra Mistry … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent (ED) : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 19.05.2020
FPA-PMLA 2386- 2390/IDR/2018
In view of notice dated 18.05.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of work in Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 12th October, 2020.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Ved Prakash Verma) Registrar
New Delhi, 18th May, 2020 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2386-2390/IDR/2018
Page 1 of 1
Satish Saraogi
Hemalata Saraogi
Manish Saraogi
Reeta Mistry
Manvendra Mistry
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Indore
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
