A non-substantive order renotifying the hearing of multiple pre-money laundering act appeals for a later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-2363/MUM/2018
| Mahesh Narsidas Patel … |
Appellant |
|---|---|
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-2364/MUM/2018 | |
| Chandrakant Narsidas Patel … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-2365/MUM/2018 | |
| Varsha Patel … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-2366/MUM/2018 | |
| Manisha Patel … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| & | |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-2367/MUM/2018 | |
| M/s. Pushpak Bullion Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared | |
| For the Appellant no(s). 1 & 3 : Mr. Gurpreet Si |
ngh, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no(s). 2, 4 & 5 : Mr. Bakul Jain, |
Advocate |
FPA-PMLA-2363-2367/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 2
For the Respondent (ED)
Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
:
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 17.03.2020
FPA-PMLA-2263-2367/MUM/2018
In view of the notice dated 16.03.2020 of this Tribunal, re-notify on
07th September, 2020.
(Ved Prakash Verma) Registrar
New Delhi,
17th March, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2363-2367/MUM/2018
Page 2 of 2
Mahesh Narsidas Patel
Chandrakant Narsidas Patel
Varsha Patel
Manisha Patel
M/s. Pushpak Bullion Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
