In view of the pandemic COVID-19 situation and notifications regarding the suspension of functioning, the Appellate Tribunal deferred the hearing of the filed stays and appeals to 21 January 2021. It clarified that existing interim orders would continue until the rescheduled date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3809/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1988/MUM/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Satyen Suresh Gathani |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3965/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2047/MUM/2017 |
||
| Raj Agarwal |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3967/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2048/MUM/2017 |
||
| Pankaj Agarwal |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3986/MUM/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2059/MUM/2017 |
||
| Kailash Chandan |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-PMLA-2108/MUM/2017 | ||
| Bharat Rajmal Shah |
… | Appellant /applicant |
Versus |
||
| The Deputy Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 1 of 3
| (6) MP-PMLA-3929/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3930/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2004/MUM/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Worldwide Oilfield Machine Pvt. Ltd. |
… | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3931/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3932/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2005/MUM/2017 |
||
| Mangesh Annachhatara | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (8) MP-PMLA-3933/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3934/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2006/MUM/2017 |
||
| Sudhir Puranik | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (9) MP-PMLA-3937/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3938/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2007/MUM/2017 |
||
| Rahul Ranka | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
| (10) MP-PMLA-3935/MUM/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3936/MUM/2017 (Exm.) FPA-PMLA-2008/MUM/2017 |
||
| Dinesh Mehta | … | Appellant /applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| , Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 2 of 3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 08.09.2020
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
The matters are listed on 21st September, 2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 8th September, 2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020 & 02.09.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 21st January, 2021.
It is clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 8th September, 2020
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-1988, 2047, 2048, 2059, 2108, 2004-2008/MUM/2017
Page 3 of 3
Satyen Suresh Gathani
Raj Agarwal
Pankaj Agarwal
Kailash Chandan
Bharat Rajmal Shah
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
