Appeals arising under the PMLA were adjourned to 01.02.2021 due to the suspension of the Tribunal's functioning caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, with interim stays clarified to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-3749/LKW/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1902/LKW/2017
Naresh Kumar Garg & Anr. … Appellants Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
&
2. MP-PMLA-3750/LKW/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1903/LKW/2017 NKG Infrastructure & Anr. … Appellants Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent (ED) | : None |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 29.10.2020
FPA-PMLA-1902/LKW/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1903/LKW/2017
The matters are listed on 03rd November, 2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notice dated 29.10.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 14.09.2020, 30.09.2020 & 15.10.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 01st February, 2021.
FPA-PMLA-1902/LKW/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1903/LKW/2017
Page 1 of 2
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any,
already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-In-Charge
New Delhi, 29th October, 2020
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1902/LKW/2017
& FPA-PMLA-1903/LKW/2017
Page 2 of 2
Naresh Kumar Garg
NKG Infrastructure
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
