An order fixing time for filing written submissions and forthcoming of the prosecution complaint in an appeal under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. No substantive decision was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-3481/LKW/2017 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1780/LKW/2017
Shri Rishi Mohan … Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. Sanjiv K. Jha, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent (ED) |
: Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 07.09.2020
FPA-PMLA-1780/LKW/2017
Learned counsels for both the parties are present. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that the written submission is yet to be filed and she is seeking four weeks time to file the written submission. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side. The written submission is to be filed containing details of the prosecution complaint. The written submission dated 03.07.2019 filed by the appellant is available on record and it is submitted that the copy of the same has already been served on other side.
List on 15th December, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 07th September, 2020 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1780/LKW/2017
Page 1 of 1
Rishi Mohan
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
