An admission order allowing the appellant further time to file the written synopsis. No merits were adjudicated.
Time granted for filing written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-PMLA-1677/DLI/2017 Mrs. C.L. Poddar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent (2) FPA-PMLA-1602/DLI/2017 Mrs. C.L. Poddar … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Pranav Mishra, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Aishani Narain, Proxy Counsel Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 17.01.2020
FPA-PMLA-1677 & 1602/DLI/2017
Mr. Pranav Mishra, Counsel for the appellant submits that he has been recently engaged in the matter and he is filing the vakalatnama during the course of the day in the registry. It is seen from the record that the written synopsis are not available. As per the last order dated 15.10.2019 the appellants were agrees to file another copy of the same but the same is not available. However, the appellants are allowed further time to file the copy of the written synopsis. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List on 9th July, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 17th January, 2020
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1677 & 1602/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
Mrs. C.L. Poddar
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
