FPA-PMLA-1652/HYD/2017 of Sheetal Refineries Limited v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Case brief
What is this about?
Sheetal Refineries Limited V/s The Joint…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-3159/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3160/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1650/HYD/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Saloni Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director |
||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-3161/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3162/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1651/HYD/2017 |
||
| Ms. Suhani Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-3170/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3171/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1652/HYD/2017 |
||
| Sheetal Refineries Limited | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-3172/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3173/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017 |
||
| Sri Tirupathi Balaji Oils | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017 | Page 1 of 3 |
| (5) MP-PMLA-3174/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3175/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1654/HYD/2017 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Jitender Kumar Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-3176/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3177/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1655/HYD/2017 |
||
| Jugal Kishore Agarwal | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (7) MP-PMLA-3197/HYD/2017 (Stay) MP-PMLA-3198/HYD/2017 (A.D.) FPA-PMLA-1672/HYD/2017 |
||
| Nidhi Agencies | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representative For the appellants : |
s who appeared Shri S.V. Vanshi Advocate |
Krishna, |
| For the respondent : |
Shri Vikas Garg, | Advocate |
| CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : |
ACTING CHAIR | MAN |
ORDER 14.02.2020
FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017
Shri S.V. Vanshi Krishna, proxy counsel for Shri P. Prasad is present
on behalf of the appellant. He is seeking some more time to file the FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017 Page 2 of 3
rejoinder in appeal no. FPA-PMLA-1653/HYD/2017 which is not opposed. It is submitted that the appellant has filed the rejoinder in the registry yesterday. The registry is directed to trace the same and placed it on record. Copy of the rejoinder is served on the other side. Pleadings are complete. So far as appeal nos. FPA-PMLA-1650, 1651, 1652, 1654, 1655 & 1672/HYD/2017 are concerned; both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis in the matter.
List on 9th July, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 14th February, 2020
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1650-1655 & 1672/HYD/2017
Page 3 of 3
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant more time to file the rejoinder in appeal.
Whether to direct the registry to trace the filed rejoinder and place it on record.
Shri P. Prasad (and others)
The Joint Director
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court