FPA-PMLA-1449/CHN/2016 of Glasten Grace v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
Glasten Grace V/s The Deputy Director…
What did the court decide?
Granted four weeks time to file written synopsis to both parties and listed the matter on 18th August, 2020.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1449/CHN/2016 Glasten Grace … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Deepak, Proxy counsel Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, Adv. For the respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Adv for Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 17.02.2020 FPA-PMLA-1449/CHN/2016
Mr. Deepak, proxy counsel for Mr. P.V. Yogeswaran, main counsel for the appellant, is present. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate is present for Mr. Neeraj Atri, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
Pleadings are complete. Proxy counsel for the appellants seeks an adjournment as the main counsel is not available due to personal difficulty.
Written synopsis have not been filed by both the parties. Both the Parties are granted further four weeks time to file the written synopsis.
List on 18th August, 2020.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Glasten Grace
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
SHRI G.C. MISHRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court