Matters listed on 9th September 2020 were adjourned to 15th January 2021 due to the suspension of tribunal functioning in view of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matters adjourned to 15th January 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-ND-175/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-ND-85/DLI/2017 |
|
|---|---|
| Joginder Kumar @ Gila | … Appellants/ Applicants |
| 2. MP-ND-176/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-ND-86/DLI/2017 |
|
| Rimpi Devi | … Appellants/ Applicants |
| 3. MP-ND-177/DLI/2017 (Stay) FPA-ND-87/DLI/2017 |
|
| Rimpi Devi (KK) | … Appellants/ Applicants |
| Versus | |
| The Competent Authority, Delhi | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER 08.09.2020 |
FPA-ND-85 to 87/DLI/2017
The matters are listed on 9th September, 2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notification dated 8th September, 2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020 & 02.09.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 15th January, 2021.
FPA-ND-85 to 87/DLI/2017
Page 1 of 1
It is clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any,
already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-in- Charge
New Delhi, 8th September, 2020
‘S’
FPA-ND-85 to 87/DLI/2017
Page 2 of 2
Joginder Kumar @ Gila and Rimpri Devi and Rimpri Devi (KK)
The Competent Authority, Delhi
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
