This is a four-line order from the Appellate Tribunal regarding FEMA, PMLA, etc. Due to suspension of work, the hearing was adjourned to September 17, 2020, clarifying that existing interim stays remain in effect.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-FE-131/HYD/2011 Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (2) FPA-FE-56/HYD/2014 Shri Gollapurdi Venu … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (3) FPA-FE-57/HYD/2014 Shri M. Srikant … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (4) FPA-FE-58/HYD/2014 M/s. Promark Infotech (Pvt.) Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (5) FPA-FE-59/HYD/2014 Shri Madhukar Mandar Patil … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (6) FPA-FE-22/HYD/2011 Shri Mool Chand … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
FPA-FE-131, 132 & 133/HYD/2011, FPA-FE-56, 57, 58 & 59/HYD/2014 FPA-FE-22, 23, 24/HYD/2011 & FPA-FE-6, 7, 8 & 9/HYD/2012
Page 1 of 3
| (7) FPA-FE-23/HYD/2011 Shri Suresh Kumar Jain |
… Appellant |
|
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… Respondent |
|
| (8) FPA-FE-24/HYD/2011 | ||
| Md. Abdul Gaffar | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… Respondent |
|
| (9) FPA-FE-132/HYD/2011 | ||
| Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (10) FPA-FE-133/HYD/2011 | ||
| Shri Sanjay | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… | Respondent |
| (11) FPA-FE-6/HYD/2012 | ||
| Shri Mohd. Khaja Moinuddin | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad |
… Respondent |
|
| (12) FPA-FE-7/HYD/2012 | ||
| Shri Mohd. Abdul Hadi | … Appellant |
|
| Versus | ||
| The Special Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … Respondent |
|
| FPA-FE-131, 132 & 133/HYD/2011, |
Page 2 of 3 | |
| FPA-FE-56, 57, 58 & 59/HYD/2014 FPA-FE-22, 23, 24/HYD/2011 & FPA-FE-6, 7, 8 & 9/HYD/2012 |
(13) FPA-FE-8/HYD/2012 Shri Mohd. Abdul Basheer … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent (14) FPA-FE-9/HYD/2012 Shri Bhik Singh … Appellant Versus The Special Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : None |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 03.04.2020
FPA-FE-131, 132 & 133/HYD/2011, FPA-FE-56, 57, 58 & 59/HYD/2014, FPA-FE-22, 23, 24/HYD/2011 & FPA-FE-6, 7, 8 & 9/HYD/2012
In view of notice dated 26.03.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of work in Appellate Tribunal, the matter is adjourned to 17th September, 2020.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Ved Prakash Verma) Registrar
New Delhi, 26th March, 2020
‘D’
FPA-FE-131, 132 & 133/HYD/2011, FPA-FE-56, 57, 58 & 59/HYD/2014 FPA-FE-22, 23, 24/HYD/2011 & FPA-FE-6, 7, 8 & 9/HYD/2012
Page 3 of 3
Shri T.V. Madhusudhan Rao
Shri Gollapurdi Venu
Shri M. Srikant
M/s. Promark Infotech (Pvt.) Ltd.
Shri Madhukar Mandar Patil
Shri Mool Chand
G.C. Mishra
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
