Appellate Tribunal order adjourning five pending matters (FPA-FE-21 to 25/DLI/2015) to 04 February 2021 due to COVID-19 pandemic and official suspension of functioning. Existing stay orders remained in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-FE-21/DLI/2015 M/s. Akzo Nobel India Ltd. … Appellant 2. FPA-FE-22/DLI/2015 Shri Nihal Kaviratne … Appellant 3. FPA-FE-23/DLI/2015 Shri Amit Jain … Appellant 4. FPA-FE-24/DLI/2015 Shri R. Gopalakrishan … Appellant 5. FPA-FE-25/DLI/2015 Shri Sanjiv Misra … Appellant
Versus
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : None CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 29.10.2020
FPA-FE-21 to 25/DLI/2015
The matters are listed on 11.11.2020 but due to pandemic COVID-19 situation and in view of notice dated 29.10.2020 read with earlier notifications dated 16.03.2020, 23.03.2020, 26.03.2020, 15.04.2020, 04.05.2020, 18.05.2020, 30.06.2020, 16.07.2020, 31.07.2020, 17.08.2020, 02.09.2020, 08.09.2020, 30.09.2020 & 15.10.2020 issued by Appellate Tribunal regarding suspension of functioning of Appellate Tribunal, the matters are adjourned to 04th February, 2021.
It is to clarify that the interim order of stay/status quo, if any, already passed, to continue till the next date of hearing.
(Roma Ambwani) Registrar-In-Charge
New Delhi, 29th October, 2020
‘A’
FPA-FE-21 to 25/DLI/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Akzo Nobel India Ltd.
Shri Nihal Kaviratne
Shri Amit Jain
Shri R. Gopalakrishan
Shri Sanjiv Misra
The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
