The Tribunal adjourned the hearing allowing the appellant to file the written synopsis by the next date, noting the opposition was not raised.
The hearing was adjourned as the appellant's main counsel was engaged elsewhere, and the opposition did not contest the request. The appellant was directed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-FE-1120/BNG/2014
Shri Umesh Shivaraman … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Archit Gupta, Proxy Counsel On behalf of Shri Udit Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Rajesh Ridla Assistant Legal Advisor |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER
17.02.2020
FPA-FE-1120/BNG/2014
Shri Archit Gupta, proxy counsel on behalf of Shri Udit Jain, the
main counsel is present. He is seeking an adjournment on the ground that Mr. Jain is engaged in another matter in Mumbai. The adjournment sought by the appellant is not opposed. Parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
List on 31st August, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 17th February, 2020
‘r’
FPA-FE-1120/BNG/2014
Page 1 of 1
Shri Umesh Shivaraman
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
