Appellants challenged an addl. application under PMLA where prosecution complaint was admitted as filed within the prescribed period. Counsel stated proceedings became infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-971/CHD/2015 S. K. Sawhney … Appellant FPA-PMLA-972/CHD/2015 G.S. Sawhney … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : Mr. Hardik Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr Faraz, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-971-972/CHD/2015
Counsel for the respondent admits that prosecution complaint within prescribed period of ninety days. Mr. S.K. Sawhney is arrrayed neither as accused in the FIR nor in the ECIR. Ld. Counsel for the appellants states that the present proceedings have been in-fructuous.
Order reserved.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 23rd April, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-971-972/CHD/2015
Page 1 of 1
S. K. Sawhney
G.S. Sawhney
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
