This interim order from the Appellate Tribunal (Prevention of Money Laundering Act), New Delhi, granted the respondent an additional opportunity to file replies within two weeks and allowed appellants to file rejoinders within two weeks thereafter, listing the matter for July 4, 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-1748/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-909/MUM/2015 |
|
|---|---|
| Sonal Patel | … Appellant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-3380/MUM/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1749/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-910/MUM/2015 |
|
| N. K. Proteins Ltd. | … Appellant |
| & | |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1750/MUM/2015 (I.R.) FPA-PMLA-911/MUM/2015 |
|
| N. K. Industries | … Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant no. 1 | : | Mr. Pragnesh M. Gandhi, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the Appellant no. 2 | : | Mr. Sahil Jaggi, Advocate |
| For the Appellant no. 3 | : | Mr. Sahil Jaggi, Advocate |
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
ORDER
26.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-909-911/MUM/2015
One more opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the replies
within two weeks.
FPA-PMLA-909-911/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 2
Liberty is given to the appellants to file the rejoinders within two
weeks thereafter.
List on 04th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
Member
New Delhi,
26th March, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-909-911/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 2
Sonal Patel
N. K. Proteins Ltd.
N. K. Industries
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
