Appellate Tribunal directed parties to file written synopses. No appearance by appellant; respondent sought six weeks time, granted for filing with service on other side. Appeals listed for later hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-1956/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-978/MUM/2015 Sandeep Arora … Appellant 2. MP-PMLA-1957/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-859/MUM/2015 Sandeep Arora … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-978/MUM/2015 & FPA-PMLA-859/MUM/2015
Written synopsis is not on record. Parties are directed to file the written synopsis. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Shri N.K. Matta, appeared on behalf of the respondent seeks six weeks time to file the written synopsis. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side. Let the appellant also file the written synopsis by the next date.
List the appeals on 27th March, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 14th October, 2019 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-978/MUM/2015 FPA-PMLA-859/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 1
Sandeep Arora
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
