Matter adjourned for two weeks, 21st February 2020, pending verification of filed written synopsis and conditional direction to file submissions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| MP-PMLA-1550/HYD/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1551/HYD/2015 (Exemption) |
||
|---|---|---|
| FPA-PMLA-830/HYD/2015 |
||
| Nathi Santosh @ Naga Santosh | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1552/HYD/2015 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-1553/HYD/2015 (Exemption) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-831/HYD/2015 | ||
| Tallapalli Praveen Kumar | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1554/HYD/2015 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-1555/HYD/2015 (Exemption) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-832/HYD/2015 | ||
| Kattekola Nagarjuna Rao | … | Appellant |
| MP-PMLA-1556/HYD/2015 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-1557/HYD/2015 (Exemption) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-833/HYD/2015 | ||
| Mohd. Khaja Pasha @ Khaja Hussain & Anr. | … |
Appellants |
| MP-PMLA-1558/HYD/2015 (Stay) | ||
| MP-PMLA-1559/HYD/2015 (Exemption) | ||
| FPA-PMLA-834/HYD/2015 | ||
| Bathula Chandrasekhar | … | Appellant |
| FPA-PMLA-585/HYD/2014 | ||
| Thoutam Shiva Kumar & Ors. |
… | Appellants |
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director, | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Ms. Sweena Nair, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri N. K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 09.08.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-830-834/HYD/2015 & FPA-PMLA-585/HYD/2014
The proxy counsel on behalf of arguing counsel to the appellant is seeking an adjournment as he is not well. No written synopsis has been filed
FPA-PMLA-830-834/HYD/2015 FPA-PMLA-585/HYD/2014
Page 1 of 2
by either side in spite of direction given. It is stated by the counsel for the appellant that they have already filed the written synopsis in the matter but the same is not on record. The counsel for the appellant is directed to verify the same in the registry, if the same is not available, let another copy of written submission be filed. Counsel for the respondent is given one more opportunity to file the written synopsis.
List on 21st February, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 09th August, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-830-834/HYD/2015 FPA-PMLA-585/HYD/2014
Page 2 of 2
Nathi Santosh @ Naga Santosh
Tallapalli Praveen Kumar
Kattekola Nagarjuna Rao
Mohd. Khaja Pasha @ Khaja Hussain
Bathula Chandrasekhar
Thoutam Shiva Kumar
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
