This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-2790/LKW/2016 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-2031/LKW/2015 FPA-PMLA-541/LKW/2013 |
|
|---|---|
| Shri Shyam Sunder Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director |
|
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-2791/LKW/2016 (Misc.) FPA-PMLA-544/LKW/2013 |
|
| Shri Ram Prasad Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-1409/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-779/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shyam Sunder Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-1412/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-780/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shyam Ganga Builders Pvt. Ltd. … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (5) MP-PMLA-1415/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-781/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shri Murli Manohar Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (6) MP-PMLA-1418/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-782/LKW/2014 |
|
| Shri Pritam Jaiswal … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-541, 544/LKW/2013, FPA-PMLA-779-782/LKW/2014 & FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 2
(7) MP-PMLA-3570/LKW/2017 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-1422/LKW/2015 (Interim Orders) FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014 Ram Prasad Jaiswal … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : None |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Ms. Aishani Narain, Proxy counsel |
| On behalf of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate | |
| CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA |
: ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 26.11.2019
FPA-PMLA-541, 544/LKW/2013, FPA-PMLA-779-782/LKW/2014 & FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
None for the appellants. Written synopsis are not on record. The respondent is seeking four weeks time to file the written synopsis. Let the same by filed within four weeks. The appellant is also given time to file the same by the next date.
List on 11th May, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 26th November, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-541, 544/LKW/2013, FPA-PMLA-779-782/LKW/2014 & FPA-PMLA-773/LKW/2014
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether time should be granted to the respondent to file a written synopsis in pending Money Laundering proceedings.
Whether the appellants are granted time to file their response to the admission of time.
Shri Shyam Sunder Jaiswal
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
