FPA-PMLA-766/CHD/2014 of Bank of Baroda v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh & others
ATFPFPA-PMLA-766/CHD/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Bank of Baroda V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
| 1. FPA-PMLA-764/CHD/2014 | |
|---|---|
| South India Bank, … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-769/CHD/2014 | |
| UCO Bank … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-761/CHD/2014 | |
| Punjab National Bank … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-766/CHD/2014 | |
| Bank of Baroda … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-1737/CHD/2017 | |
| The Branch Manager, South India Bank … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … & others |
Respondents |
¶3
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶4
| For the appellant no. 1 : | Sh. P.I. Jose, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the appellant no. 2 : | Sh. Rajesh Rattan, Advocate |
| For the appellant no. 3 : | Sh. Rajat Sharma, Advocate |
| For the appellant no. 4 : | Sh. Narendra Singh, Advocate |
| For the appellant no. 5 : | Sh. P.I. Jose, Advocate |
| For the Respondent no. 1 : |
Sh. N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : |
CHAIRMAN |
| ORDER | |
| 28.01.2019 |
¶5
FPA-PMLA-1737/CHD/ FPA-PMLA-764,769,761,766/CHD/2014
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
South India Bank
- appellant
UCO Bank
- appellant
Punjab National Bank
- appellant
Bank of Baroda
- appellant
The Branch Manager, South India Bank
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · January
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-766/CHD/2014
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court