The Appellate Tribunal granted two weeks to the respondent to file a prosecution complaint after receiving a compilation of documents. The case was adjourned for specific dates.
Time granted to respondent to file prosecution complaint.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-759/BNG/2014 Shivalingaiah … Applicant/Appellant FPA-PMLA-760/BNG/2014 H.P. Sumitra … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri S.C. Gupta, Tax Consultant Mr. A.K. Tewary, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G. C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| ORDER 27.03.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-759-760/BNG/2014
Ld. Counsel for the appellant has filed the typed copy of compilation of documents and also served to ld. counsel for the respondent who seeks two weeks time to file the prosecution complaint. Let the same be done with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant by the next date.
Re-notify on 9th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 27th March, 2019 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-759-760/BNG/2014
Page 1 of 1
Shivalingaiah
H. P. Sumitra
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
