FPA-PMLA-684/LKW/2014 of Shri Mayank Dubey v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Mayank Dubey V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-1986/LKW/2015 (Mics.) MP-PMLA-1596/LKW/2015 (Mics.) |
|
|---|---|
| MP-PMLA-1506/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) | |
| MP-PMLA-1255/LKW/2014 (Interim Relief) | |
| FPA-PMLA-683/LKW/2014 | |
| Smt. Rama Dubey … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| 2. MP-PMLA-1506/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) MP-PMLA-1254/LKW/2014 (I.R.) |
|
| FPA-PMLA-684/LKW/2014 | |
| Shri Mayank Dubey … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| & | |
| 3. MP-PMLA-1731/LKW/2015 (Mics.) MP-PMLA-1505/LKW/2015 (FDR) |
|
| MP-PMLA-1507/LKW/2015 (Affidivate) MP-PMLA-1253/LKW/2014 (I.R.) |
|
| FPA-PMLA-685/LKW/2014 | |
| Shri Radhey Shyam Dubey … |
Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Joint Director | |
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Radhey Shyam Dubey, Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Mohd. Faraz, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Rama Dubey
- appellant
Shri Mayank Dubey
- appellant
Shri Radhey Shyam Dubey
- respondent
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-684/LKW/2014
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court