This order records an adjournment request in two PMLA stay applications appearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The court observed that the appellant's main counsel underwent surgery but provided only the date of re-notice without deciding the plea or disposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-1235/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-649/MUM/2014
Shri Rakesh Brijlal Jain … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent 2. MP-PMLA-1234/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-650/MUM/2014 Manju Jain … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Aditya Chaudhary, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 22.01.2019 FPA-PMLA-649/MUM/2014
Counsel for the appellant submits that the main arguing counsel
has undergone surgery and requests for an adjournment.
Re-notify on 28th May, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 22nd January, 2019. ‘s’ FPA-PMLA-649 & 650/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Rakesh Brijlal Jain
Manju Jain
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
