FPA-PMLA-632/MUM/2014 of Meenakshi Mansotra v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai

ATFP26 Nov 2019FPA-PMLA-632/MUM/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Acting Chairman of the Appellate Tribunal was present with counsel for the respondent, but no arguments were heard from appellants as none appeared. The respondent was granted time to file written synopsis, and the matter was listed for the next date.

What did the court decide?

None granted; time allowed for filing synopsis and listing for next date.

FPA-PMLA-632/MUM/2014 of Meenakshi Mansotra v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

1. MP-PMLA-979/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-576/MUM/2014
Meenaxi Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
2. MP-PMLA-981/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-578/MUM/2014
Shri Ashwani Kumar Sharma	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
3. MP-PMLA-982/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-579/MUM/2014
Meenakshi Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent

¶3

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶4

For the Appellants :	None
For the Respondent :	Ms. Aishani Narain, Proxy counsel On behalf of Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate
4. FPA-PMLA-630/MUM/2014
Meenaxi Mansotra	… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumba	i … Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the Appellant	: None
For the Respondent	: Mr. Vineet Mishra, Proxy counsel &
	Mr. Rishav Dubey, Proxy counsel
	On behalf of Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate

¶7

FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583/MUM/2014 & FPA-PMLA-630-635/MUM/2014

¶8

Page 1 of 3

¶9

5. MP-PMLA-1019/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-583/MUM/2014
Meenakshi Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
6. MP-PMLA-1171/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-631/MUM/2014
Ms. Mannat Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
7. MP-PMLA-1173/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-632/MUM/2014
Meenakshi Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
8. MP-PMLA-1176/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-633/MUM/2014
Ms. Mannat Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
9. MP-PMLA-1178/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-634/MUM/2014
Meenakshi Mansotra	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent
&
10. MP-PMLA-1180/MUM/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-635/MUM/2014
Ashwani Kumar Sharma	…	Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai	…	Respondent

¶10

FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583/MUM/2014 & FPA-PMLA-630-635/MUM/2014

¶11

Page 2 of 3

¶12

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶13

For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Mr. Naveen Kumar Matta, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN

¶14

ORDER 26.11.2019

¶15

FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583/MUM/2014 & FPA-PMLA-630-635/ MUM/2014

¶16

None for the appellants. Learned counsels for the respondent are present. Written synopsis are not filed. The learned counsels for the respondent are seeking time to file the written synopsis, the same is allowed. Let the same be filed by the respondent by the next date.

¶17

In the interest of justice, Registry is directed to issue notices to the appellants to remain present by themselves or through their authorised representatives/advocates on the next date and to file the written synopsis by the next date.

¶18

List on 14^th April, 2020.

¶19

(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶20

New Delhi, 26^th November, 2019

¶21

‘AS’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-576, 578, 579, 583/MUM/2014 & FPA-PMLA-630-635/MUM/2014

¶23

Page 3 of 3