Disposed

FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 of Nandani Ramchandhani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

ATFP11 Dec 2019FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A one-line order by the Appellate Tribunal for SEBI, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT. The tribunal fixed a timeline for filing written synopses in seven appeals and allowed adjournment due to counsel illness. Decided 11.12.2019 by Acting Chairman.

What did the court decide?

None granted; matter adjourned for filing of written synopses.

FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 of Nandani Ramchandhani v/s The… — Writ and Judicial Review | ATFP (2019)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

(1) FPA-PMLA-392/LKW/2012
Hinish Ram Chandhani	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(2) FPA-PMLA-393/LKW/2012
Smt. Nandini Ram Chandhani	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(3) FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012
M/s. SRS Developers	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(4) FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012
Shri Ashish Sewani	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(5) FPA-PMLA-396/LKW/2012
Smt. Preeti Sewani	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(6) FPA-PMLA-397/LKW/2012
SRS Laminators	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent
(7) FPA-PMLA-404/LKW/2012
SRS Investment Co.	…	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow	…	Respondent

¶3

FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013

¶4

Page 1 of 2

¶5

(8) FPA-PMLA-538/LKW/2013
Hinish Ramchandhani …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow …	Respondent
(9) FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013
Nandani Ramchandhani …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow …	Respondent
(10) FPA-PMLA-540/LKW/2013
Preeti Sewani …	Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow …	Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appe	ared
For the appellant : Shri Rake for the ma	sh Kumar Singh, Intern in counsel
For the respondent : Ms. Aisha Shri Vikas	ni Narain, proxy counsel for Garg, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING C	HAIRMAN

¶6

ORDER 11.12.2019 FPA-PMLA392 - 397 & 404/LKW/2012, FPA-PMLA-538540/LKW/2013

¶7

Ms. Aishani Narain, proxy counsel for Shri Vikas Garg, main counsel is present for the Respondent. Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, intern in the office of the main counsel informed the Tribunal that the mother of the main counsel has expired as a result of which he could not appeared. It is informed by the proxy counsel of the appellant that pleadings are complete and written synopsis are to be filed. Both the parties are allowed to file their written synopsis by the next date with an advance copy to be served on each other.

¶8

List on 18^th May, 2020.

¶9

(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman

¶10

New Delhi, 11^th December, 2019

¶11

‘D’

¶12

FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013

¶13

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 of Nandani Ramchandhani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 of Nandani Ramchandhani v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases