Petitioner sought adjournment due to counsel unavailability. Order granted respondent four weeks to file written arguments. Hearing listed for 20th May 2020.
Respondent granted four weeks to file written arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-864/CHN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013 M. Moorthy … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent 2. MP-PMLA-862/CHN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-519/CHN/2013 M. Moorthy … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. A. Arockiaraj, Proxy counsel For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN ORDER 16.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013 & FPA-PMLA-519/CHN/2013
Proxy counsel Shri A. Arockiaraj appearing for the main counsel
for the appellant submits that the main counsel is not available today and is seeking an adjournment. The respondent is granted four weeks time to file the written arguments with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
List on 20th May, 2020 for hearing.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi,
16th December, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-518/CHN/2013 & FPA-PMLA-519/CHN/2013
Page 1 of 1
M. Moorthy
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
