This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) FPA-PMLA-392/LKW/2012 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hinish Ram Chandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (2) FPA-PMLA-393/LKW/2012 | ||
| Smt. Nandini Ram Chandhani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
| (3) FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012 | ||
| M/s. SRS Developers | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (4) FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012 | ||
| Shri Ashish Sewani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (5) FPA-PMLA-396/LKW/2012 | ||
| Smt. Preeti Sewani | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (6) FPA-PMLA-397/LKW/2012 | ||
| SRS Laminators | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
| (7) FPA-PMLA-404/LKW/2012 | ||
| SRS Investment Co. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow |
… | Respondent |
FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013
Page 1 of 2
| (8) FPA-PMLA-538/LKW/2013 | |
|---|---|
| Hinish Ramchandhani … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (9) FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 | |
| Nandani Ramchandhani … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| (10) FPA-PMLA-540/LKW/2013 | |
| Preeti Sewani … |
Appellant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … |
Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appe | ared |
| For the appellant : Shri Rake for the ma |
sh Kumar Singh, Intern in counsel |
| For the respondent : Ms. Aisha Shri Vikas |
ni Narain, proxy counsel for Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING C |
HAIRMAN |
ORDER 11.12.2019 FPA-PMLA392 - 397 & 404/LKW/2012, FPA-PMLA-538540/LKW/2013
Ms. Aishani Narain, proxy counsel for Shri Vikas Garg, main counsel is present for the Respondent. Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, intern in the office of the main counsel informed the Tribunal that the mother of the main counsel has expired as a result of which he could not appeared. It is informed by the proxy counsel of the appellant that pleadings are complete and written synopsis are to be filed. Both the parties are allowed to file their written synopsis by the next date with an advance copy to be served on each other.
List on 18th May, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 11th December, 2019
‘D’
FPA-PMLA-392-397 & 404/LKW/2012 FPA-PMLA-538-540/LKW/2013
Page 2 of 2
Hinish Ram Chandhani
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
