FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012 of M/s SRs Developers v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
M/s SRs Developers V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. | FPA-PMLA-403/LKW/2012 Vivek Prasad |
… | Appellant |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2. | FPA-PMLA-392/LKW/2012 | ||
| Hinish Ram Chandhani | … | Appellant | |
| 3. | FPA-PMLA-393/LKW/2012 | ||
| Smt. Nandini Ram Chandani | … | Appellant | |
| 4. | FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012 M/s SRs Developers |
… | Appellant |
| 5. | FPA-PMLA-395/LKW/2012 Sh. Ashish Sewani |
… | Appellant |
| 6. | FPA-PMLA-396/LKW/2012 Smt. Preeti Sewani |
… | Appellant |
| 7. | FPA-PMLA-397/LKW/2012 Hinish Ram Chandhani |
… | Appellan |
| **8. ** | FPA-PMLA-404/LKW/2012 SRs Laminators |
… | Appellant |
| **9. ** | FPA-PMLA-538/LKW/2013 SRS Investiment Co. |
… | Appellant |
| 10. | FPA-PMLA-539/LKW/2013 Nandani Ramchandani |
… | Appellant |
| **11. ** | FPA-PMLA-540/LKW/2013 Preeti Sewani |
… | Appellant |
| Versus | |||
| The Deputy Director | |||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. P. Chakrravarty, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vivek Prasad
- appellant
Hinish Ram Chandhani
- appellant
Smt. Nandini Ram Chandani
- appellant
M/s SRs Developers
- appellant
Sh. Ashish Sewani
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · January
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-394/LKW/2012
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court