Appellants in enforcement matters sought an adjournment due to loss of case brief and a request for a copy of the file record from the Tribunal. The respondent raised no objection, and the matter was listed for future hearing in March 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-PMLA-431/CHN/2013 S. Martin … Appellant/Applicant (2) FPA-PMLA-432/CHN/2013 N. Usha … Appellant/Applicant (3) FPA-PMLA-390/CHN/2012 G. Moorthy … Appellant/Applicant (4) FPA-PMLA-391/CHN/2012 M. Nagarajan … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Pratham, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 09.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-431-432/CHN/2013 & FPA-PMLA-390-391/CHN/2012
Mr. Pratham Arora, Advocate appearing on behalf of main counsel submits that the case brief of the appellant has been lost and he has requested a copy of entire file record from this Tribunal. He has filed an application today in this regard. He seeks an adjournment on aforesaid ground. There is no objection from other side.
At request, list on 24th March, 2020.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 9th October, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-431 & 432/CHN/2013 FPA-PMLA-390 & 391/CHN/2012
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief for loss of case brief and order record from Tribal file?
Claim for grant of copy of entire file record
S. Martin
N. Usha
G. Moorthy
M. Nagarajan
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
