Disposed

FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019 of M/s. V.S. Healthcare v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

ATFP30 May 2019FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal directed issue of notice to the respondent for file-a-reply in the forfeited attachment appeals. The Tribunal granted interim protection to maintain status quo regarding attached properties pending further orders.

What did the court decide?

Interim order granting leave to prefer appeals, directing parties to maintain status quo regarding attached properties, and prohibiting disposal of assets.

FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019 of M/s. V.S. Healthcare v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna — ATFP (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-6091/ PTN/2019 (EH.) MP-PMLA-6092/ PTN/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019 M/s. V.S. Healthcare … Appellant MP-PMLA-6093/ PTN/2019 (EH.) MP-PMLA-6094/ PTN/2019 (Stay) MP-PMLA-6095/ PTN/2019 (Exam.) & FPA-PMLA-3071/PTN/2019 M/s. Resource E Waste Solution Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-6096/ PTN/2019 (EH.) & FPA-PMLA-3072/PTN/2019 My Car Pvt. Ltd. Kanpur … Appellant & MP-PMLA-5331/PTN/2018 (E.H) MP-PMLA-5332/PTN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-5333/PTN/2018 (Exem) MP-PMLA-5334/PTN/2018 (COD) FPA-PMLA-2739/PTN/2018 M/s My Car Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant

¶3

Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent

¶4

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶5

For the Appellant	: Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Anand, Advocate
For the Respondent	: Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER
	ORDER 30.05.2019

¶6

FPA-PMLA-3070-3072/PTN/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2739/PTN/2018

¶7

The above mentioned appeals have been filed under Section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 2^nd May, 2019 passed in O.C. No. 106/2018. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Nitesh Rana, Advocate accepts that notice. He seeks time to file the reply.

¶8

FPA-PMLA-3070-3072/PTN/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2739/PTN/2018

¶9

Page 1 of 2

¶10

Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the ld. Counsel for the appellants who may also file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶11

List this appeal for final hearing on 16^th July, 2019.

¶12

Ld. Counsels appearing on behalf of the appellants are pressing for an interim order in view of the grounds raised in their respective appeals. We have gone through the grounds of appeal and material placed on record. We here also considered the impugned order passed against the appellant. After hearing, we are of the view that the appeals have made a good prima facie case in his favour and in case the interim order is not passed the appellant will suffer irreparable loss and injury. Till the next date the parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the attached properties. The appellants shall also not dispose of and interfere-with in any manner directly or indirectly till the next date.

¶13

Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti’ to all the parties.

¶14

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶15

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶16

New Delhi, 30^th May, 2019

¶17

‘K’

¶18

FPA-PMLA-3070-3072/PTN/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2739/PTN/2018

¶19

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019 of M/s. V.S. Healthcare v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-3070/PTN/2019 of M/s. V.S. Healthcare v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases