FPA-PMLA-3019/BNG/2019 of Shri S. K. Paramesh v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri S. K. Paramesh V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-3017/BNG/2019 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dr. V. Anuradha | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore | … | Respondent |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-3018/BNG/2019 | ||
| Dr. Nikhil S. P. | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore | … | Respondent |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-3019/BNG/2019 | ||
| Shri S. K. Paramesh | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Shri Abid Jeelani, proxy counsel |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Mr. S. K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : ACTING CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 05.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-3017-3018-3019/BNG/2019
Shri Abid Jilani, Associate of the main counsel appeared in the matter. Shri S.K. Sharma, the learned counsel for the respondent is present. It is seen from the record that on 6th May, 2019 status quo order was passed on the ground that the notice under section 8(4) has already been stayed by the Hon’ble High Court, Karnataka. On perusal of application for stay it is seen at para no. 3 of the said application that
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. V. Anuradha
- appellant
Dr. Nikhil S. P.
- appellant
Shri S. K. Paramesh
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court