A fresh appeal and a condonation of delay application were filed under Section 26 of the PML Act, 2002. The order adjourns the application for argument to May 6, 2019, and grants the respondent two weeks to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5969/ CHD /2019 (Stay) MP-PMLA-5970/MUM/2019 (COD) FPA-PMLA-3005/CHD/2019
M/s. Sai Bhakti Ipes (P) Ltd … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 15.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-3005/CHD/2019
Fresh appeal has been filed under Section 26 of PML Act, 2002 against the order dated 9th December, 2018. Alongwith the appeal the application for condonation of delay of 43 day has also been filed. Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate seeks two week time to file the reply.
List the application for argument on 6th May, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 15th April, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-3005/CHD/2019
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of delay under Section 26 of PMLA, 2002 may be allowed.
Whether time is granted to the respondent to file a reply to the fresh appeal.
M/s. Sai Bhakti Ipes (P) Ltd
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
