Listing order in Prevention of Money Laundering Act review petitions. Directions for filing reply, response, and written synopsis by specified timelines with an interim order to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5862/JP/2019 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-2972/JP/2019 Ramesh Chandra Sharma … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 01.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-2972/JP/2019
Reply is not on record. Learned counsel for the respondent states that he does not have the reply’s copy and he will verify the same in the Registry in case the same has not been filed. Another set of reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
Both the parties are also allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
Interim order to continue.
List on 18th November, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 01st July, 2019 ‘AS’ FPA-PMLA-2972/JP/2019
Page 1 of 1
Ramesh Chandra Sharma
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
