The Appellate Tribunal fixed a date for hearing the rejoinders and stayed the applications for additional documents filed by the appellants during the course of these fee payment appeal proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-5598/MUM/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2874/MUM/2019 M/s. Laxmi Infradevelopers Ltd. … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
&
2. MP-PMLA-5599/MUM/2019 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2875/MUM/2019 Rakesh Girdharilal Gajera … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Dr. Shamsuddin, Advocate Mr. Devesh Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Mohammad Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 06.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-2874/MUM/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2875/MUM/2019
Rejoinders have been filed. Learned counsel for the appellants states
that he wishes to file the application for additional documents.
List on 13th May, 2019.
Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti ’ to both the parties.
New Delhi, 06th May, 2019
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2874/MUM/2019 & FPA-PMLA-2875/MUM/2019
Page 1 of 1
Manmohan Singh
Sadhu Singh
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
