Appeal admitted against the order dated 27 August 2018. Fresh appeal requires condonation of delay. Directions issued for filing reply/rejoinder by respective dates. Matter listed for hearing on 15 July 2019.
Time fixed for filing reply and rejoinder; matter listed for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5517/SRT/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5518/SRT/2019 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-2819/SRT/2019
Abdul Hamid Lone … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Surat … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Mir Imtiyaz, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 08.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-2821/SRT/2019 & MP-PMLA-5522/SRT/2019 (COD)
Fresh appeal has been filed under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 27th August, 2018. Alongwith the appeal, an application for condonation of delay has also been filed. The prayer is strongly opposed on behalf of the respondent. Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks and rejoinder by the next date.
List the appeal as well as application on 15th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 08th April, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2819/SRT/2019
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 26 of PMLA requires condonation of delay.
Abdul Hamid Lone
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
