Adjudging two fresh appeals, the tribunal condoned the delay in filing. It granted four weeks to the respondent to file a reply and six weeks for the appellant to produce an advance copy. The status quo regarding a specific property was maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5463/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5464/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5465/AHD/2019 (Stay)
& FPA-PMLA-2794/AHD/2019 M/s. ABC Cotspin Pvt. Ltd. … Appellant MP-PMLA-5466/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5467/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5468/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2795/AHD/2019 Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra … Appellant
MP-PMLA-5479/AHD/2019 (COD) MP-PMLA-5470/AHD/2019 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5471/AHD/2019 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-2796/AHD/2019 Shri Ashwin Ashok Patel … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Shri Yuvraj G. Thakore, Advocate For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER ORDER 15.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019 & MP-PMLA-5463, 5466 & 5479/AHD/2019 (COD)
Appellant has filed the fresh appeals under Section 26 of Prevention of Money
Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 05th November, 2018. Alongwith the
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019
Page 1 of 2
appeals, the appellant has filed the application for condonation of delay. We have heard learned counsel for the appellant. There is a small delay. The same is condoned.
Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks six weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be done within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
In the meanwhile, status quo shall be maintained by both the parties with
regard to the second property. The detail of the second property is given below:
| Sr. No. | Property **name/description ** |
Name of the **owner ** |
Date of Purchase |
Value (in Rs.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | C-3, Nikumbh Complex, Law Garden, Ahmedabad (Super built up Area of 995 Sq. Feet, Municipal Tenament number 0513-07-1236- 0001-C At |
Mr. Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra |
21.01.2008 | Purchased for Rs. 18,00,000/- and market value during December, 2015 as per valuation report dated 20.03.2018- |
| Changispur T.P. |
Rs. | |||
| Scheme No. 3, final plot No. 424 paiki, sub-plot No. 5 paiki) |
54,72,500/- |
List on 09th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 15th January, 2019
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-2794-2796/AHD/2019
Page 2 of 2
M/s. ABC Cotspin Pvt. Ltd.
Shri Ashish Sureshbhai Jobanputra
Shri Ashwin Ashok Patel
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Justice Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
