The Tribunal listed fresh appeals filed under S. 26 PMLA with a prolonged delay. It noted strong opposition to the delay condonation by the respondent's counsel and directed them to file a reply within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. MP-PMLA-5426/SRT/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-5427/SRT/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2775/SRT/2018
Ramesh Jagubhai Patel @ Michael … Appellant/Applicant
2. MP-PMLA-5428/SRT/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-5429/SRT/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2776/SRT/2018
Alka Thakorbhai Patel … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director
Directorate of Enforcement, Surat
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Gurpreet Singh, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Mohd. Faraz, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
07.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2775 to 2777/SRT/2018
Fresh appeals have been filed u/s 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 31st August, 2017. Alongwith the appeal an application for condonation of delay for 370 days has also been filed. The prayer made in the application is strongly opposed by the counsel of the respondent, who seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within six weeks.
List on 23rd April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-2775 to 2777/SRT/2018
New Delhi, 7th January, 2019
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay application for 370 days against filing appeal under S. 26 should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAMESH JAGUBHAI PATEL @ MICHAEL
AJAY KUMAR BHULABHAI PATEL
ALKA THAKORBHAI PATEL
THE JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, SURAT
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
