Minute order issuing notice for final hearing on a filed appeal and stay application under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The Tribunal directed parties to file written synopsis and fixed a date for final hearing. No substantive disposition is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5359/AHD/2018 (Exem.) MP-PMLA-5358/AHD/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2750/AHD/2018
AGM, Bank of Boroda
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate Mr. Didyarani, Advocate For the respondent no. 1 : Ms. Shilpi S. Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 07.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2750/AHD/2018
The present appeal has been filed u/s 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the impugned order dated 5th November, 2018.
Issue notice in the main appeal as well as stay application. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder by the next date of hearing.
List for final hearing on 8th April, 2019.
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next date.
In the meanwhile, no coercive steps shall be taken by the respondent in view of the impugned order.
Order be given dasti to both the parties.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 7th January, 2019 ‘S’ FPA-PMLA-2750/AHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
AGM, Bank of Boroda
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
