The Appellate Tribunal observed that the matter was wrongly listed in the Fitness Proceedings Appeal as the order in the main appeal had already been allowed and attached to the file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-6172/AHD/2019 (Misc.)
& FPA-PMLA-2742/AHD/2018 Mr. Bhuvan Madan … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Mr. Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN ORDER 01.07.2019 FPA-PMLA-2742/AHD/2018
The matter is wrongly listed as the order has already been passed in this appeal. The order passed in the appeal may be attached with the file as the appeal in this matter has already been allowed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 01st July, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2742/AHD/2018
Page 1 of 1
AS
Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
