Order allowing extension for filing reply in PMLA proceedings; no substantive decision on merits.
Order allowing extension for filing reply in PMLA proceedings; no substantive decision on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS, PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5313/JL/2018 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-2732/JL/2018
Shri Ramesh Mehan & Ors. … Appellants
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Ishan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM SHRI G.C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER 09.10.2019
FPA-PMLA-2732/JL/2018
Reply is not on record. The learned counsel for the respondent is seeking six weeks time to file the reply to which there is no objections to the other side. Let the same be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to be served to the other side who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 18th March, 2020.
Interim order to continue.
(G.C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 09th October, 2019. ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-2732/JL/2018
Page 1 of 1
Shri Ramesh Mehan & Ors.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
G.C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
