In FPA-PMLA-2731/CHN/2018, the Tribunal listed回复 filed 4 weeks later. The status quo order remains in force.
This tribunal listed the application for subsequent information. It directed the respondent to file the reply within four weeks and allowed the appellant-filed copy for rebuttals within 4 weeks thereafter. The status quo order remains in force.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5309/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2731/CHN/2018
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
M/s. Kanishk Gold Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate For the Respondent no. 1, 2 & 3 : Shri Naveen Malhotra, Advocate For the Respondent no. 4 : Mr. Anand Varma & Mr. Dhirya, Advocates
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 15.07.2019
FPA-PMLA-2731/CHN/2018
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. Mr. Mahlotra, Advocate states that he would be filing the same. Let the same be done within four weeks with an advance copy of the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 9th December, 2019.
Status quo order already passed shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 15th July, 2019.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-2731/CHN/2018
Page 1 of 1
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
M/s. Kanishk Gold Pvt. Ltd.
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
