The Appellate Tribunal listed a fresh application filed by the appellant against the Respondent for proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act for reply and rejoinder, noting the date of listing. The order is procedural in nature without substantive adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4316/HYD/2018 (U/s-35) & FPA-PMLA-271/HYD/2011
B. Rama Raju … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : | Mr. Sridhar Potaraju, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Shiwani Tushir, Advocate | ||
| Mr. Yashvir, Advocate | ||
| Mr. Sindoora, Advocate | ||
| For the Respondent | : | Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
ORDER 28.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-271/HYD/2011
Fresh application has been filed by Mr. B. Rama Raju. The prayer is opposed by the respondent. Let the reply be filed by the respondent within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 08th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi, 28th January, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-271/HYD/2011
Page 1 of 1
B. Rama Raju
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
MANMOHAN SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
