List order in a stay petition filed under the PMLA. The matter is adjourned to 9th April, 2019. The stay petition is treated as part heard with no coercive action till the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5214/BBS/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2691/BBS/2018 Smita Pattanayak … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneshwar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellant | : |
Sh. Nand Laud, Sh. Subas Acharya Ivo D’Costa & Sh. Aditya P. Swain, Advocates |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Sh. Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| SMT. ANANYA RAY | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 07.03.2019
FPA-PMLA-2691/BBS/2018
The learned counsel for the appellant argued the stay petition at length and he stated that prima facie, the case is in their favour. The learned counsel for the respondent after hearing the appellants sought some time to respond to the same as he needs time to take instructions. The matter is therefore adjourned. The stay petition is treated as part heard.
List for further arguments on 9th April, 2019.
No coercive action to be taken till the next date of hearing.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 7th March, 2019
M
FPA-PMLA-2691/BBS/2018
Page 1 of 1
Smita Pattanayak
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bhubaneshwar
Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
