A non-substantive procedural order in a PMLA appeal listing subsequent steps. No legal principle articulated and no substantive relief granted at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-5066/DLI/2018 (U.H.) MP-PMLA-5067/DLI/2018 (Exem.) MP-PMLA-5068/DLI/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2597/DLI/2018
M/s. Tristar Enterprises … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Shri Arup Kumar Ghosh, Advocate for Shri Arun Kumar Agarwal, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri A.R. Aditya, Advocate On behalf of Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
03.05.2019
FPA-PMLA-2597/DLI/2018
Rejoinder has been filed on behalf of the appellant. The pleadings
are complete. Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis.
List for arguments on 11th July, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 03rd May, 2019
‘r’
FPA-PMLA-2597/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Tristar Enterprises
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G. C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
