A listing order in six FPA-PMLA cases before the Appellate Tribunal. The respondent failed to file a reply, and the matter was listed for further hearing on 8th April 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. FPA-PMLA-2557/MUM/2018 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sahil Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. FPA-PMLA-2558/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sagar Surendra Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 3. FPA-PMLA-2559/MUM/2018 | ||
| Sunny Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 4. FPA-PMLA-2560/MUM/2018 | ||
| Praveen Kumar l |
… | Appellant/Applicant |
| 5. FPA-PMLA-2561/MUM/2018 | ||
| Rosy Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 6. FPA-PMLA-2562/MUM/2018 | ||
| Vishal Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 7. FPA-PMLA-2563/MUM/2018 | ||
| Ramesh Nagpal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… |
Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Sahil Ramesh Nagpal, Appellant For the Respondent : Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER 14.01.2019
FPA-PMLA-2557 to 2563/MUM/2018
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. Let the same be filed within four weeks as last opportunity with an advance copy to the
FPA-PMLA-2557 to 2563/MUM/2018
Page 1 of 2
counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 8th April, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
New Delhi,
14th January, 2019
‘S’
FPA-PMLA-2557 to 2563/MUM/2018
Page 2 of 2
Sahil Ramesh Nagpal
Sagar Surendra Nagpal
Sunny Ramesh Nagpal
Praveen Kumar
Rosy Nagpal
Vishal Ramesh Nagpal
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
