In FPA-PMLA-2549/DLI/2018, the Tribunal adjourned the matter for final hearing, granting the appellant four weeks time to file a rejoinder with an advance copy to the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-4944/DLI/2018 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-2549/DLI/2018 Shri Anup Prakash Garg … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellant : Mr. Vijay Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, S. P. P. Mr. A. R. Aditya, Advocate CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY : MEMBER
ORDER 09.04.2019
FPA-PMLA-2549/DLI/2018
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks four weeks time to file the rejoinder as he was served the copy of the reply on the last occasion. The learned counsel for the respondent objects to the same as it is listed for final hearing today.
In the interest of justice, I am inclined to give four weeks time to the learned counsel for the appellant to file the rejoinder alongwith an advance copy to the respondent.
List on 29th May, 2019.
(Ananya Ray) Member
New Delhi, 09th April, 2019 ‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-2549/DLI/2018
Page 1 of 1
Shri Anup Prakash Garg
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi
Smt. Ananya Ray
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
