FPA-PMLA-2547/PTN/2018 of Shri Shyamal Chravarty v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
Case brief
What is this about?
Shri Shyamal Chravarty V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-5299/PTN/2018 (E.H.) MP-PMLA-5210/PTN/2018 (Misc.) In MP-PMLA-5069/PTN/2018 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-4938/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2542/PTN/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Pradeep Kumar | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Patna | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-4939/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2543/PTN/2018 |
||
| Shri Rajendra Kumar | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-4940/PTN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2544/PTN/2018 |
||
| Nand Lal HUF | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna |
… | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-5017/PTN/2018 (Stay) MP-PMLA-4943/PTN/2018 FPA-PMLA-2547/PTN/2018 |
||
| Shri Shyamal Chravarty | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Patna | … | Respondent |
| Advocates/Authorized Representatives who | appe | ared |
| For the appellant : | Shri | Vinay Prakash, Advocate |
| For the respondent : |
Shri Ms. Adv |
A.K. Tripathi, Advocate for Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, ocate |
FPA-PMLA-2542, 2543, 2544 & 2547/PTN/2018
Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. Pradeep Kumar
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
- appellant
Shri Rajendra Kumar
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Patna
- appellant
Nand Lal HUF
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court