FPA-PMLA-2528/CHN/2018 of K.C. Karthik Madhav v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
K.C. Karthik Madhav V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, PMLA, NDPS & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| (1) MP-PMLA-4910/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2525/CHN/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Deepa Impex India Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
| (2) MP-PMLA-4911/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2526/CHN/2018 |
||
| Shri K.C. Chandran | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
| (3) MP-PMLA-4912/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2527/CHN/2018 |
||
| Smt. C. Chandra | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
| (4) MP-PMLA-4913/CHN/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2528/CHN/2018 |
||
| K.C. Karthik Madhav | … | Appellant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai |
… | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate Shri S. Ravi, Advocate Shri P. Venkatesan, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Deepa Impex India Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
- appellant
Shri K.C. Chandran
- appellant
Shri K.C. Chandran
- appellant
Smt. C. Chandra
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · July
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-2528/CHN/2018
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court